Geostatistical analysis of aboveground carbon stock in Mopane forests
Main Article Content
Abstract
Tropical forests play a crucial role in regulating the climate and maintaining the global carbon cycle. Carbon is primarily stored in plant biomass. In Africa, these forests still present significant uncertainty in the carbon balance. This is due to scarce inventories and a lack of continuous monitoring. Mopane forests (Colophospermum mopane) are typical of dry tropical regions and have important ecological and socioeconomic roles. They are widely used by local communities. In Mozambique, charcoal production mainly drives degradation of these forests and loss of aboveground carbon (AGC). The aim of this study is to analyze aboveground carbon stock in Mopane forests in the Chicualacuala District, Southern Mozambique. The data used refer to georeferenced tree locations in a fragment of native forest. Aboveground biomass was individually estimated through a pantropical equation, using as predictor variables: diameter at breast height (DBH), total height, and basic wood density. From the biomass estimates, AGC was calculated and subsequently analyzed using geostatistical methods such as variograms and ordinary kriging. The results indicated that the ordinary kriging model partially captured the spatial pattern of AGC and, as evidenced by cross-validation, showed a moderate positive correlation (54.66%) between observed and predicted values. This level of correlation suggests that while the model provides a reasonable prediction of AGC, there is still considerable unexplained variability, which highlights areas for further model refinement or additional data collection.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
1. Anderson-Teixeira, K. J.,Wang, M. M. H., Mcgarvey, J. C.&LeBauer, D. S. Carbon dynamics of mature and regrowth tropical forests derived from a pantropical database (TropForC-db). Global Change Biology 22 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13226
2. Asner, G. P., Sousan, S., Knapp, D. E., Selmants, P. C., Martin, R. E., Hughes, R. F. & Giardina, C. P. Rapid forest carbon assessments of oceanic islands: A case study of the Hawaiian archipelago. Carbon Balance and Management 11, 1–13 (2016).
3. Baccini, A., Walker, W., Carvalho, L., Farina, M., Sulla-Menashe, D. & Houghton, R. A. Tropical forests are a net carbon source based on aboveground measurements of gain and loss. Science 358, 230–234 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam5962
4. Burrows, J. E., Burrows, S. M., Lötter, M. C. & Schmidt, E. Trees and Shrubs Mozambique (Print Matters Heritage, Cape Town, 2018).
5. Canadell, J. G. & Raupach, M. R. Managing forests for climate change mitigation. Science 320, 1456–1457 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1155458
6. Chave, J. et al. Improved allometric models to estimate the aboveground biomass of tropical trees. Global Change Biology 20 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12629
7. Ciais, P., Bombelli, A.,Williams, M., Piao, S. L., Chave, J., Ryan, C. M., Henry, M., Brender, P. & Valentini, R. The carbon balance of Africa: synthesis of recent research studies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 369 (2011). doi:10.1098/rsta.2010.0328
8. Fischer, R. The long-term consequences of forest fires on the carbon fluxes of a tropical forest in Africa. Applied Sciences 11 (2021).
9. Gasser, T., Crepin, L., Quilcaille, Y., Houghton, R. A., Ciais, P. & Obersteiner, M. Historical CO2 emissions from land use and land cover change and their uncertainty. Biogeosciences 17 (2020). https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-4075-2020
10. Gibbs, H. K., Brown, S., Niles, J. O. & Foley, J. A. Monitoring and estimating tropical forest carbon stocks: Making REDD a Reality. Environmental Research Letters 2 (2007).
11. Gizachew, B., Solberg, S., Næsset, E., Gobakken, T., Bollandsås, O. M., Breidenbach, J., Zahabu, E. & Mauya, E. W. Mapping and estimating the total living biomass and carbon in low-biomass woodlands using Landsat 8 CDR data. Carbon Balance and Management 11 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13021-016-0055-8
12. Grainger, A. Constraints on modelling the deforestation and degradation of tropical open woodlands. Global Ecology and Biogeography 8, 179–190 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1466-822X.1999.00135.x
13. Guedes, B. S., Sitoe, A. A. & Olsson, B. A. Allometric models for managing lowland miombo woodlands of the Beira corridor in Mozambique. Global Ecology and Conservation 13, e00374 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2018.e00374
14. Gumbo, D. et al. How have carbon stocks in central and southern Africa’s miombo woodlands changed over the last 50 years? A systematic map of the evidence. Environmental Evidence 7 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-018-0128-0
15. Hilmi, N., Chami, R., Sutherland, M. D., Hall-Spencer, J. M., Lebleu, L., Benitez, M. B. & Levin, L. A. The role of blue carbon in climate change mitigation and carbon stock conservation. Frontiers in Climate (2021). https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2021.710546
16. Ho, V. H., Morita, H., Ho, T. H., Bachofer, F. & Nguyen, T. T. Comparison of geostatistics, machine learning algorithms, and their hybrid approaches for modeling soil organic carbon density in tropical forests. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 1–24 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-025-04027-5
17. Houghton, R. A., House, J. I., Pongratz, J., Van DerWerf, G. R., Defries, R. S., Hansen, M. C., Le Quéré, C. & Ramankutty, N. Carbon emissions from land use and land-cover change. Biogeosciences 9 (2012). https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-5125-2012
18. Isaaks, E. H. & Srivastava, R. M. Applied Geostatistics (Oxford University Press, New York, 1989).
19. Kay, H., Santoro, M., Cartus, O., Bunting, P. & Lucas, R. Exploring the relationship between forest canopy height and canopy density fromspaceborne LiDAR observations. Remote Sensing 13 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13244961
20. Kuyah, S., Sileshi, G. W., Njoloma, J., Mng’omba, S. & Neufeldt, H. Estimating aboveground tree biomass in three different miombo woodlands and associated land use systems in Malawi. Biomass and Bioenergy 66 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.02.005
21. Lisboa, S. N., Macôo, S. & Sitoe, A. Allometric equations for estimating above and belowground biomass of Colophospermum mopane in Mozambique. Scientific Reports 15 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-87297-w
22. Macôo, S. J., Miranda, E. N. & Gomide, L. R. Evolutionary algorithms for predicting aboveground carbon stocks in mopane woodlands in Mozambique. Carbon Management 16 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2025.2504937
23. Makhado, R. A., Mapaure, I., Potgieter, M. J., Luus-Powell, W. J. & Saidi, A. T. Factors influencing the adaptation and distribution of Colophospermum mopane in southern Africa’s mopane savannas – A review. Bothalia 44 (2014). https://doi.org/10.4102/ABC.V44I1.152
24. Malhi, Y. The productivity, metabolism and carbon cycle of tropical forest vegetation. Journal of Ecology 100, 65–75 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01916.x
25. Maniatis, D. & Mollicone, D. Options for sampling and stratification for national forest inventories to implement REDD+ under the UNFCCC. Carbon Balance and Management 5 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1186/1750-0680-5-9
26. Maquia, I., Catarino, S., Pena, A. R., Brito, D. R. A., Ribeiro, N. S., Romeiras, M. M. & Ribeiro-Barros, A. I. Diversification of African tree legumes in Miombo–Mopane woodlands. Plants 8 (2019). https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/8/6/182#
27. Marzoli, A. Inventário Florestal Nacional: Avaliação Integrada das Florestas de Moçambique (AIFM) 98 (Ministerio da Agricultura, Direcção Nacional de Terras e Florestas, Maputo, 2007).
28. Matheron, G. Traité de géoestatistique appliquée (Le Krigeage, Paris, 1963).
29. Means, J. E., Acker, S. A., Harding, D. J., Blair, J. B., Lefsky, M. A., Cohen, W. B., Harmon, M. E. & McKee, W. A. Use of large-footprint scanning airborne lidar to estimate forest stand characteristics in the western cascades of Oregon. Remote Sensing of Environment 63 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(98)00091-1
30. Millar, C. I., Stephenson, N. L. & Stephens, S. L. Climate change and forests of the future: managing in the face of uncertainty. Ecological Applications 17 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1890/06-1715.1
31. Njana, M. A., Mbilinyi, B. & Eliakimu, Z. The role of forests in the mitigation of global climate change: empirical evidence from Tanzania. Environmental Challenges 4 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2021.100170
32. Oliveira, W. A., Santos, W. D. M., Mello, J. M. & Scalon, J. D. Caracterização de processos pontuais marcados pela função de correlação marcada: uma aplicação em dados florestais. Sigmae 12, 177–186 (2023). https://doi.org/10.29327/2537114.12.3-19
33. Parvizi, Y. & Fatehi, S. Geospatial digital mapping of soil organic carbon using machine learning and geostatistical methods in different land uses. Scientific Reports 15, 4449 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-88062-9
34. Pelletier, J., Paquette, A., Mbindo, K., Zimba, N., Siampale, A., Chendauka, B., Siangulube, F. & Roberts, J. W. Carbon sink despite large deforestation in African tropical dry forests (miombo woodlands). Environmental Research Letters 13 (2018). DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aadc9a
35. Pelletier, J., Siampale, A., Legendre, P., Jantz, P., Laporte, N. T. & Goetz, S. J. Human and natural controls of the variation in aboveground tree biomass in African dry tropical forests. Ecological Applications 27 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.1550
36. Peng, M., Xu, M., Zhang, J., Qiu, B., Teng, C. & Chen, C. Mapping forest aboveground carbon stock of combined stratified sampling and RFRK model with mean annual temperature and precipitation. Scientific Reports 15, 17410 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-02338-8
37. Powlson, D. S., Bhogal, A., Chambers, B. J.,Coleman, K., Macdonald, A. J., Goulding, K. W. T. & Whitmore, A. P. The potential to increase soil carbon stocks through reduced tillage or organic material additions in England andWales: A case study. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 146, 23–33 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2011.10.004
38. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing Vienna, Austria, 2025.
39. Ribeiro, N. S., Matos, C. N., Moura, I. R., Washington-Allen, R. A. & Ribeiro, A. I. Monitoring vegetation dynamics and carbon stock density in miombo woodlands. Carbon Balance and Management 8 (2013).
40. Ribeiro Júnior, P. J. & Diggle, P. J. geoR: A package for geostatistical analysis. R-News 1, 15–18 (2001).
41. Scalon, J. D. Análise de dados espaciais com aplicações em R 275 (Editora UFLA, Lavras, 2024).
42. Sedano, F, Lisboa, S. N., Duncanson, L, et al. Monitoring forest degradation from charcoal production with historical Landsat imagery: A case study in southern Mozambique. Environmental Research Letters 15, 015001 (2020). DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ab3186
43. Stevens, N. What shapes the range edge of a dominant African savanna tree, Colophospermum mopane? A demographic approach. Ecology and Evolution 11 (2021).
44. Tamene, L., Mponela, P., Sileshi, G. W., Chen, J. & Tondoh, J. E. Spatial variation in tree density and estimated aboveground carbon stocks in southern Africa. Forests 7 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3390/f7030057
45. Tuzine, M. S., Dantas, D., Finiasse, A. R. & Calegario, N. Distribuição espacial de atributos florestais em um ecossistema de Mecrusse, no sul de Moçambique. Revista Espinhaço 11 (2022).
46. Valentini, R. et al. A full greenhouse gases budget of Africa: synthesis, uncertainties, and vulnerabilities.
Biogeosciences 11 (2014). https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-381-2014
47. Van Wyk, B. & Van Wyk, P. Field guide to trees of Southern Africa (Struik Publishers (Pty) Limited, Cape Town, 1997).
48. Vashum, K. T. & Jayakumar, S. Methods to Estimate Above-Ground Biomass and Carbon Stock in Natural Forests: A Review. Journal of Ecosystem & Ecography 2, 1–7 (2012). https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7625.1000116
49. Wang, Y., Wang, H., Wang, C., Zhang, S., Wang, R., Wang, S. & Duan, J. Co-Kriging-Guided Interpolation for Mapping ForestAboveground Biomass by Integrating Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation and Sentinel-2 Data. Remote Sensing 16, 2913 (2024). https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/16/16/2913#
50. Woollen, E. et al. Charcoal production in the mopane woodlands of Mozambique: what are the trade-offs with other ecosystem services? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 371 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0315
51. Yang, H., Qin, Z., Shu, Q., Xi, L., Xia, C., Wu, Z., Wang, M. & Duan, D. Estimation of the Aboveground Carbon Storage of Dendrocalamus giganteus Based on Spaceborne Lidar Co-Kriging. Forests 15, 1440 (2024). https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/15/8/1440#